Bloom

= Bloom's Revised Taxonomy = I had no idea Bloom's Taxonomy had been revised. -- ECI 521 2008 student

For many of us who learned to teach with the original Bloom's Taxonomy, there was always a nagging suspicion that to create should really be at the top of the taxonomy. It wasn't until the 2001 revision that we felt affirmed.

Unfortunately, the revision didn't seem to make it to teachers-in-the-field nor really influence university teacher education programs for a long ten years. Things are beginning to change.

Specific Inquiry Question to Guide Summary: Relate the Revised Taxonomy and the Three Types of Learning (Cognitive, Affective, and Psychomotor). How does “Learning Through Literature” fit in?

Resources: > > Graphics of old and new with action verbs for each level > > > > A bit of history and explanation of how instructional designers and teachers can use the new taxonomy > > > How the Taxonomy promotes active learning and a valuable diagram, the Taxonomy Circle > > > Church is a middle school teacher who insightfully explains the technology and Bloom's Revised Taxonomy connection.
 * Taxonomy and the Three Types of Learning (Cognitive, Affective, Psychomotor)
 * Bloom’s Revised Taxonomy
 * Using the New Bloom's Taxonomy to Design Meaningful Learning Assessments [[file:Bloom's Taxonomy.pdf]] by Kevin Smythe & Jane Halonen
 * Bloom’s Taxonomy Blooms Digitally by Andrew Church